# Covered Calls: A Devil's Bargain

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygVObRx9X68
Recap page: https://rapidrecap.app/video/ygVObRx9X68
Generated: 2025-09-14T12:31:50.41+00:00

---
## Quick Overview

Covered calls are not good for long-term investors seeking positive returns because they limit upside potential, reduce expected returns, and increase risk, ultimately leading to underperformance compared to simply holding the underlying equity.

**Key Points:**
- Covered calls are a strategy where investors sell call options on equities they own to generate income, but this caps upside potential and increases risk.
- Selling call options with lower strike prices generates higher income but leads to greater downside risk and a higher chance of capping upside returns.
- The "premium" from selling options is not a substitute for returns; it's a payment for giving up upside potential.
- Historically, while covered call ETFs have provided higher distribution yields, they have underperformed the underlying equity by a significant margin, especially over longer time frames.
- Covered calls mechanically lead to lower expected returns and higher risk because they reduce exposure to positive equity movements while retaining downside risk.
- For long-term investors seeking growth, simply holding the underlying equity is a superior strategy to selling covered calls, as the latter forfeits upside potential.
- The concept of 'distribution yield' is often used to market covered call strategies, but it's crucial to understand that distribution yields are not the same as total returns and can be misleading.

![Screenshot at 00:01: The video opens with the title card "COVERED CALLS" and stacks of money on either side of the speaker, visually representing the income-generating aspect of the strategy.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-00-01.png)

**Context:** The video argues that covered call strategies, often marketed as a way to generate income with lower volatility, are ultimately detrimental to long-term investors. It explains that while selling call options generates immediate income (premium), it caps the upside potential of the underlying stock and introduces additional risk. The speaker uses academic research and performance data to demonstrate that, over the long run, covered call strategies have underperformed their underlying equities, making them a poor choice for investors focused on growth and long-term wealth accumulation.

## Detailed Analysis

The video debunks the notion that covered calls are a beneficial strategy for long-term investors seeking positive returns. It asserts that covered calls are essentially a "devil's bargain" because while they generate income through option premiums, they significantly cap upside potential and increase risk. The speaker cites research indicating that covered call strategies often underperform their underlying equities, particularly over longer time horizons. This underperformance stems from the mechanical nature of the strategy: selling calls reduces exposure to positive stock movements while retaining downside risk. The video highlights that the "distribution yield" often used to market these strategies is not a true measure of return and can be misleading, as it comes at the cost of potential growth. The speaker uses performance data from ETFs like BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) to show how they have underperformed their underlying indices (like the S&P 500 or Tesla stock) by significant margins over time. For instance, the BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF underperformed the BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF by over 70% in a three-year rolling period. Similarly, the YieldMax TSLA ETF underperformed Tesla stock by nearly 93% over a 12-month period. The speaker concludes that for investors aiming for long-term growth, simply holding the underlying equity is a far superior strategy, as covered calls artificially limit upside and introduce risks that ultimately hinder long-term wealth accumulation, making them a poor choice for those seeking consistent positive returns.

### Core Argument

- Covered calls are a poor strategy for long-term investors seeking growth due to capped upside, increased risk, and underperformance compared to simply holding the underlying equity.

### Mechanism of Covered Calls

- Selling call options generates income (premium) but limits potential gains and retains downside risk.

### Empirical Evidence

- Historical data from ETFs shows covered call strategies significantly underperform their underlying equities, particularly in up markets.

### Misleading Marketing

- Distribution yields are used to market covered call funds, but these yields come at the expense of potential growth and increased risk.

### Key Takeaway

- For long-term investors focused on growth, holding the underlying equity is superior to employing a covered call strategy.

### Examples

- BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) underperformed their respective benchmarks significantly over various time periods.

### Risk vs. Reward

- The strategy trades a limited upside for a potentially misleadingly high yield, ultimately harming long-term returns.

![Screenshot at 00:01: The video opens with the title card "COVERED CALLS" and stacks of money on either side of the speaker, visually representing the income-generating aspect of the strategy.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-00-01.png)
![Screenshot at 00:15: A graph illustrates the concept of a covered call strategy, showing a capped upside \(green dashed line\) and the potential for downside risk \(red dashed line\).](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-00-15.png)
![Screenshot at 00:32: The title "COVERED CALLS A DEVIL'S BARGAIN" appears on screen, setting the tone for the video's critical analysis.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-00-32.png)
![Screenshot at 01:06: The video highlights text from a study stating that "financial assertions that are presented as true and meaningful but are actually meaningless: that is financial pseudo-profound bullshit."](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-01-06.png)
![Screenshot at 01:50: A graphic displays "CALL OPTION" with a red tag showing dollar signs, symbolizing the income generated from selling options.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-01-50.png)
![Screenshot at 02:05: A graphic illustrates that a call option is the "RIGHT TO BUY" at a specific "STRIKE PRICE" for a "PREMIUM."](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-02-05.png)
![Screenshot at 02:27: A chart shows the relationship between "Derivative Yield" and "Short Call-Expected Return," illustrating the inverse correlation.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-02-27.png)
![Screenshot at 03:18: Exhibit 3 displays "Toy Model - Relationships between Derivative Yield, Option Delta, and Equity Risk Premium," showing how option delta and risk premium change with derivative yield.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-03-18.png)
![Screenshot at 03:40: Exhibit 5 illustrates "Derivative Yield versus Short Call Expected Return," demonstrating that higher derivative yields lead to lower expected returns.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-03-40.png)
![Screenshot at 04:15: Exhibit 7 shows "Historical Analysis - Derivative Yield versus Excess Return and Realized Alpha," comparing returns from different time periods and derivative yields.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ygVObRx9X68/00-04-15.png)