【小岛求助】百万大v的亲身经历，说说共产党是怎么夺走属于我的2000万的

Quick Overview

The speaker asserts that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) funds external propaganda efforts through opaque channels, often involving state-affiliated MCNs and contractors, rather than direct payments to individual overseas bloggers, resulting in a system where financial benefits are distributed internally or through intermediaries, thereby making it difficult to directly prove illicit foreign influence, even when the content aligns with CCP interests.

Key Points: The speaker alleges that an anonymous source ("Beijing Brother") claimed to receive 40,000 Euros monthly for propaganda work, which the speaker later calculates to be about 2.8 million RMB annually, or 20 million RMB over five years. The speaker suggests that CCP propaganda funding is not directly given to overseas political bloggers but is channeled through contractors and state-affiliated MCNs who then distribute funds based on internal KPIs or personal preferences. The speaker notes the existence of a seemingly official entity called 'Lan'an Think Tank' (蓝岸智库), which is actually an MCN run by 'Sima Nan' (司马南), suggesting these official-sounding entities are used for resource distribution. The speaker contends that the CCP's propaganda system, established since 2013, focuses on promoting Chinese stories globally, exemplified by the promotion of Confucius Institutes. The speaker calculates that if they were paid 40,000 Euros monthly for the propaganda they produce, it would be a significant loss of potential income if they had to convert it to RMB or if they couldn't legally operate in China. The speaker points out that while the CCP's actions (like creating state-backed think tanks and funding influencers) might appear beneficial to some, they ultimately restrict free expression and benefit insiders, as evidenced by the lack of transparency in funding distribution. The speaker concludes that many anti-CCP bloggers are also trapped in a cycle where their income or success depends on catering to the system, leading to self-censorship or a focus on less controversial topics, even if they express anti-CCP sentiments.