Every Mistake I Made in 2025

Quick Overview

The creator details numerous small factual errors and omissions made across several of their previous videos throughout 2023 and early 2024, including incorrect specs for the Nothing Phone 3, misattributing the ultrasonic fingerprint sensor on the Pixel 9, citing an inaccurate price for the Xiaomi SU7 Max, and misstating the refresh rate for the Nothing Phone 3, emphasizing that the review process needs continuous self-correction to maintain high standards.

Key Points: The creator made several factual mistakes in past reviews, including citing a 960Hz PWM dimming rate for the Nothing Phone 3, which was later corrected to 2160Hz. In the Samsung S25 Ultra review, the creator incorrectly claimed 1TB UFS 4.0 storage, which does not exist on the device. The creator mistakenly called the unreleased MacBook Air the M4 MacBook Pro once near the end of its review. The creator initially misstated that the Pixel 9 fingerprint reader was optical when it was actually ultrasonic, correcting this via a pinned comment. The Xiaomi SU7 Max price was initially cited as ¥299,000 but later correctly converted to approximately $42,000 USD, which is closer to the actual $46,000 USD price. The creator admitted to having a long way to go in perfecting their review process, exemplified by these errors, and committed to improving their fact-checking.

Context: The video serves as a meta-commentary where the creator dedicates time to reviewing their own past work, specifically identifying and correcting factual errors, misstatements, and omissions they made in videos released throughout 2023 and early 2024 across various tech reviews (Apple, Samsung, OnePlus, Xiaomi) and software updates (Android 16). The creator expresses taking pride in accuracy but acknowledges the difficulty of maintaining perfection across numerous, rapidly produced content pieces.

Detailed Analysis

The creator, MKBHD, details a self-audit of factual errors made in recent videos. He starts by discussing YouTube annotations, noting that the feature was discontinued due to abuse (like spammy links), but he wishes it could return for minor fact corrections. He then runs through specific mistakes: in his Nothing Phone 3 review, he cited 960Hz PWM dimming when the correct figure is 2160Hz. In the Samsung S25 Ultra review, he mistakenly cited 1TB UFS 4.0 storage, which he later learned doesn't exist. He also mistakenly called the unreleased M4 MacBook Air the M4 MacBook Pro in that review. Regarding the Pixel 9, he incorrectly claimed the fingerprint reader was optical when it was ultrasonic, a correction he made later via a pinned comment. For the Xiaomi SU7 Max review, he initially used the local Chinese price (¥299,000) and converted it to an incorrect USD equivalent ($42,000) instead of the more accurate $46,000. He also notes that the Apple iPhone 17 Air prototype was physically narrower and taller than the base iPhone 16. The creator concludes that while these errors are frustrating, they are often due to relying on early, unverified leaks or simply failing to double-check details, and he vows to be more rigorous in his fact-checking process going forward.