Phone Call EXPOSES Don Lemon's Plan to Intentionally Break the Law

Quick Overview

The video reveals that Don Lemon was allegedly informed by Brian Shapiro that protesters planned to disrupt a church service, and Lemon was reportedly complicit by recording the event, which the speaker argues is a worse offense than the disruption itself because it violates the constitutional freedom of religion.

Key Points: Brian Shapiro told the speaker he had a private conversation with Don Lemon about protesters planning to disrupt a church service the following day. Lemon did not deny knowing about the planned protest or that protesters intended to disrupt the church service, which the speaker asserts is wrong. The speaker believes Lemon's action of recording the event, even if he didn't actively participate in the disruption, is a worse offense than the disruption itself. Footage shows Don Lemon's correspondent interviewing protesters in the snow outside the church, with one protester stating they were there to worship Jesus. The speaker suggests that while the protesters broke the law by disrupting the service, Lemon’s involvement in recording it makes his actions more concerning regarding the violation of religious freedom. The speaker notes that the protesters were reportedly yelling chants and that some children were scared by the confrontation, although the speaker believes the children will be okay.

Context: The video features a discussion between two commentators regarding an incident involving conservative commentator Don Lemon and protesters at a church service, which was reportedly pre-planned. The primary focus is on Lemon's alleged prior knowledge of the protest plans, communicated to him by Brian Shapiro, and the ethical implications of Lemon's team recording the confrontation, especially when compared to the protesters' actions.

Detailed Analysis

The speaker recounts being told by Brian Shpiro that Shpiro had a private conversation with Don Lemon about protesters intending to disrupt a church service the next day. The speaker was intrigued and later confirmed this information by reviewing videos Don Lemon posted. The speaker emphasizes that Lemon knew about the plan to disrupt the church service and that the protesters intended to stop the service, possibly using a mob. The speaker argues that even if Lemon was not directly participating in the disruption, his decision to record the event—which included yelling chants and potentially scaring children—is a worse offense than the protesters' actions because it infringes upon the constitutional freedom of religion. The speaker points out that Lemon's recorded actions suggest a level of complicity, especially when he asked the pastor if he should leave, implying he was already embedded in the disruptive operation. The speaker concludes that while the protesters broke the law and constitutional rights, Lemon's actions of recording and confronting the situation, while maintaining plausible deniability about his intent, are critically flawed. The video cuts to footage of Don Lemon's correspondent interviewing protesters in the snow outside the church, one of whom stated their purpose was to worship Jesus, further illustrating the disruption the speaker is referencing.