The Witcher Season 4 - HOW BAD WAS IT!? - Angry Review

Quick Overview

The reviewers collectively gave The Witcher Season 4 a low rating of 3/10, citing poor writing, confusing timelines, and perceived narrative pandering as major issues, despite acknowledging some strong character moments and good action sequences like the mage battle and the fight where Geralt kills the monster.

Key Points: The panel collectively rated the reviewed Witcher Season 4 content a 3/10, indicating significant disappointment. The main criticisms centered on what the reviewers perceived as poor writing, confusing timeline jumps, and unnecessary exposition, particularly concerning the character of Jaskier. Henry Cavill's performance as Geralt was praised as being 'really good' and 'charismatic,' and his fight scenes, like the one against the monster (01:25), were highlighted as strong points. The reviewers heavily criticized the handling of the sorceresses and the introduction of characters like the 'rats' (Fringilla's group) and the character of the 'evil sorcerer' (01:27), finding their writing weak. One major point of contention was the decision to separate Ciri and Geralt for long periods, which the reviewers felt broke immersion. The segment discussing the fate of the sorceresses (03:25) and the general dark, morally grey tone of the show was mentioned, but ultimately overshadowed by the perceived narrative failures. The reviewers noted that the showrunners seemed to be prioritizing certain storylines (like the politics of Ciri's parentage) over the book material, which they felt was handled poorly.

Context: This video features three reviewers from 'The Angry Joe Show' discussing their impressions of the recently released season of Netflix's 'The Witcher,' likely Season 4 based on context referring to Henry Cavill's departure and the introduction of Liam Hemsworth. The panel critiques the season's writing, character arcs, and overall narrative cohesion, contrasting the show's direction with the source material (the books).

Detailed Analysis

The review panel delivered a harsh verdict on the season, scoring it a 3/10 overall. The main thrust of the criticism was directed at the writing quality, citing a 'slow' pace, confusing timelines that separated key characters like Geralt and Ciri for too long, and poor character development for characters other than Geralt. The reviewers felt that major plot points, such as the death of Geralt's mentor Vesemir or the battle at the Sodden Hill, were handled poorly or lacked emotional weight due to being rushed or poorly set up. Specific examples of poor writing included the characters' dialogue feeling 'amateur' and unnecessary exposition being given for events the characters already knew. The reviewers specifically disliked the portrayal of the sorceresses, noting their motivations felt manipulative and that their arc felt like an attempt to force a political narrative rather than serving the story. They praised Henry Cavill's performance as Geralt, considering him a highlight, but felt his character was underserved by the surrounding plot and supporting cast. The panel concluded that while individual action scenes were sometimes good (like the mage battle), the overall narrative structure and writing quality were severely lacking, making the season mostly boring.