BREAKING: Secret Census Algorithm STOLE House Seats from Red States!

Quick Overview

The 2020 Census, allegedly engineered by partisan actor John M. Abowd, resulted in significant overcounts in Democrat-leaning states and undercounts in Republican ones, leading to a partisan advantage in representation and the allocation of over $90 billion in federal funds, with Democratic states projected to gain $57 billion unearned.

Key Points: The 2020 Census suffered from significant errors, including overcounts in Democrat-leaning states and undercounts in Republican states, costing Republican states almost $90 billion in federal funds across the decade. The errors were allegedly produced by a partisan actor, Census Bureau's Chief Scientist John M. Abowd, who implemented a system of differential privacy that favored Democrats. Democratic states are projected to gain $57 billion in federal funds as a result of these miscounts, which is described as a reweighting of national political power by mathematical fiat. The Census Bureau's post-enumeration survey revealed significant errors in 14 states, including New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Hawaii, Delaware, Minnesota, and Ohio. Six of the eight states unfairly penalized by undercounts (Texas, Florida, Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, Illinois) would have gained a seat in the House, with New York potentially losing one seat due to the errors. The Constitution mandates an actual enumeration, but Abowd's differential privacy method substituted fabricated numbers for real ones, which critics argue is a modern invention and not a constitutional mandate. The remedy proposed includes authorizing a 2020 Census Reproduction Project to republish results using traditional disclosure avoidance methods, banning differential privacy, and requiring states to provide records to help determine citizenship status.

Context: The video features attorney Andrew Branca discussing the findings from a hearing on the oversight of the U.S. Census Bureau, focusing on allegations that the 2020 Census results were skewed by a partisan algorithm introduced by Chief Scientist John M. Abowd. The discussion centers on how these alleged miscounts affect congressional apportionment and the distribution of federal funding, drawing heavily from a document detailing how the differential privacy methods allegedly favored Democratic states.