# Are these a scam? Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXZ-NfMu60Q Recap page: https://rapidrecap.app/video/aXZ-NfMu60Q Generated: 2026-02-10T18:40:15.196+00:00 --- ## Quick Overview Testing various DIY and commercial Faraday cage solutions, including aluminum foil, a cookie tin, and specialized bags, revealed that only the commercially available Mission Darkness bag and the Samfolk box fully blocked RF signals, while the DIY aluminum foil hat and the cookie tin showed significant signal leakage, demonstrating that proper construction and material quality are crucial for effective EMP protection. **Key Points:** - The baseline RF measurement inside the anechoic chamber with the door closed was essentially zero (0.00 mV/m). - The cheap, DIY aluminum foil bag failed testing, showing a high reading of 587.4 mV/m when tested with an iPhone inside, indicating poor shielding. - The Samfolk Faraday Box Set provided excellent shielding, reducing the signal to 0.167 mV/m (0.17 mV/m), which is orders of magnitude lower than the baseline measurement outside the chamber. - The Mission Darkness Faraday Bag also performed excellently, resulting in a reading of 0.190 mV/m, nearly as good as the Samfolk box. - The Ridge wallet, which claims to block RFID, showed only minor signal reduction (from 1.108 V/m to 0.167 V/m) when tested in the setup, but it did not fully enclose the RF source. - The aluminum foil hat and the cookie tin both showed substantial signal leakage, confirming that DIY methods are unreliable without proper construction. - The video sponsored by Squarespace, which offers an AI website builder and domain registration with free WHOIS privacy and SSL. ![Screenshot at 00:57: The EMF meter shows a reading of 0.167 mV/m when the phone is inside the Samfolk Faraday Box, indicating near-perfect signal blockage and confirming the commercial product's effectiveness.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/aXZ-NfMu60Q/00-00-57.jpg) **Context:** The video tests the effectiveness of various Faraday cage solutions—ranging from cheap DIY methods like aluminum foil and cookie tins to commercially available bags and boxes—in blocking electromagnetic radiation (RF signals). The tests are conducted inside an anechoic chamber provided by Raymond EMC, using an Extech 8GHz EMF Meter as a receiver to measure the signal strength of a transmitting phone placed inside the shielded containers. The goal is to determine which shielding methods actually work against modern RF threats. ## Detailed Analysis The host begins by establishing a near-zero RF baseline (0.00 mV/m) inside the Raymond EMC Quiet Chamber with the door closed. First, he tests several consumer Faraday cage products. The cheap Hodufy bag, which relies on folding the top over twice, showed a relatively high reading of 942.4 mV/m before being sealed, dropping to 0.167 mV/m (or 0.17 mV/m) after the test, which the host implies is too high compared to the box. The Samfolk Faraday Box Set, costing $25, achieved near-perfect isolation, reading 0.167 mV/m (or 0.17 mV/m), only slightly higher than the chamber's near-zero baseline. The Mission Darkness Faraday Bag also performed very well, resulting in 0.190 mV/m. The Ridge wallet, designed for RFID blocking, only managed to reduce the signal slightly when tested against the reader (from 1.108 V/m down to 0.167 V/m), suggesting its enclosure method is insufficient for complete blocking. Finally, the host tests DIY solutions: the aluminum foil hat and the Danish butter cookie tin. The aluminum foil bag constructed by folding foil resulted in a very high reading of 587.4 mV/m, while the cookie tin showed leakage (0.209 V/m) due to seam imperfections, though the host suggests the tin is better than the foil bag if sealed perfectly. The fabric material from Amradield performed excellently, achieving 0.018 mV/m, similar to the sealed chamber baseline. The video concludes that while DIY solutions offer some protection, commercial products like the Samfolk box offer superior, reliable shielding. ### Test Setup and Baseline - The test uses an Extech 8GHz EMF Meter inside an anechoic chamber provided by Raymond EMC; the baseline reading with the door closed is near zero (0.00 mV/m). ### Commercial Products Testing - The Samfolk Faraday Box achieved an excellent reading of 0.167 mV/m; the Mission Darkness Faraday Bag performed similarly well at 0.190 mV/m; the Ridge wallet showed minor attenuation. ### DIY Solutions Testing - A DIY aluminum foil bag failed significantly, reading 587.4 mV/m; the cookie tin showed leakage (0.209 V/m) but was better than the foil bag. ### Faraday Fabric Test - The Amradield Faraday Fabric performed exceptionally well, resulting in a reading of 0.018 mV/m when folded over itself. ### Sponsor Segment - Squarespace is advertised as an easy, AI-powered website builder offering tools for store management, payment processing, and domain registration with free privacy and SSL. ![Screenshot at 00:26: The host holds the Extech 8GHz EMF Meter, which displays a reading of 2.55 mV/m outside the Faraday cage setup.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/aXZ-NfMu60Q/00-00-26.jpg) ![Screenshot at 00:33: The host displays the Extech EMF meter showing a baseline reading of 2.07 mV/m outside the chamber walls.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/aXZ-NfMu60Q/00-00-33.jpg) ![Screenshot at 01:25: The various Faraday cage products laid out on the table, including the Samfolk box, various pouches, the Mission Darkness bag, and the Amradield fabric.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/aXZ-NfMu60Q/00-01-25.jpg) ![Screenshot at 03:13: The RF Explorer Pro shows a strong signal spike at 146.400 MHz \(-35.55 dBm\) before shielding is applied.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/aXZ-NfMu60Q/00-03-13.jpg) ![Screenshot at 05:55: The Amradield Faraday Fabric test results in a very low reading of 0.198 mV/m, marked with a green checkmark, indicating near-perfect shielding.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/aXZ-NfMu60Q/00-05-55.jpg)