Why Ukraine and Israel Don't Use flamethrowers... but China Does

Quick Overview

Flamethrowers are not widely used by Ukraine or Israel due to their weight, short range, and logistical complexity, making them less practical than modern alternatives, though China still fields them as a psychological weapon and for specialized bunker-clearing operations.

Key Points: Flamethrowers are generally not used by Ukraine or Israel because they are heavy, have a short range (around 40 meters), and are logistically complex to maintain and operate. Modern warfare often favors more efficient and safer methods for bunker clearing and psychological impact, such as precision artillery, drones, and thermobaric rockets. China, however, still utilizes flamethrowers, specifically the Type 74 thermobaric rocket launcher, for their psychological impact and effectiveness in clearing fortified positions like bunkers and tunnels. The operational effectiveness of flamethrowers is limited by their weight (up to 70 pounds when fueled) and the short duration of their fuel supply, typically allowing only 6-7 bursts. The psychological effect of flamethrowers is significant, as they are inherently terrifying weapons that can cause immense damage and fear. While many countries have phased out flamethrowers, some, like China, retain them for specific tactical advantages, particularly in confined spaces or against hardened targets.

Context: The video explores the reasons why flamethrowers, while historically significant weapons, are not commonly employed by modern military forces like Ukraine and Israel, contrasting this with their continued use by China. It touches upon the tactical advantages and disadvantages of flamethrowers, their psychological impact, and the evolution of warfare technology.

Detailed Analysis

Flamethrowers are largely absent from the arsenals of modern militaries like Ukraine and Israel due to several significant drawbacks. These weapons are extremely heavy, weighing up to 70 pounds when fully fueled, and have a very limited operational range of approximately 40 meters. Logistically, they are cumbersome to transport and maintain, requiring specialized fuel and careful handling. Furthermore, their effectiveness is often limited by the short duration of their fuel supply, typically allowing only a few bursts before needing a refill. Modern warfare has developed more efficient and safer alternatives for achieving similar objectives, such as precision artillery, advanced explosives, and specialized drones. Despite these limitations, China continues to employ flamethrowers, such as the Type 74 thermobaric rocket launcher, recognizing their potent psychological impact and effectiveness in clearing fortified positions like bunkers and tunnels. The video also highlights the evolution of weaponry, noting that while flamethrowers might seem outdated, their psychological terror and specific applications in confined spaces keep them relevant in some military doctrines, even as other nations focus on more technologically advanced solutions.