# Trump's Tariffs are about to get F**KED | Supreme Court

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOLhEV43ESY
Recap page: https://rapidrecap.app/video/ZOLhEV43ESY
Generated: 2026-01-08T20:40:00.304+00:00

---
## Quick Overview

The Supreme Court is strongly suggested to strike down Donald Trump's AIPA tariffs, which the speaker believes will be a major bullish catalyst for the economy by immediately lowering inflation, increasing growth, and giving the Federal Reserve license to cut rates, despite the procedural delay this might impose on future tariff implementation.

**Key Points:**
- The overall tone of the Supreme Court arguments suggested that Trump will lose on at least some of his reciprocal and fentanyl-related AIPA tariffs.
- Six justices—Roberts, Gorsuch, Jackson, Kagan, Sotomayor, and Barrett—seem skeptical that Trump has the authority to use these tariffs, suggesting a potential 6-3 decision against the tariffs.
- The primary legal hurdle is the Major Questions Doctrine, which requires Congress to clearly designate power for actions of vast economic significance, and AIPA tariffs are not clearly designated.
- Upwards of a thousand lawsuits are filed against Trump's tariffs, seeking approximately $160 billion in refunds, indicating strong market expectation that the AIPA tariffs will be invalidated.
- If AIPA tariffs are struck down, future tariffs using Section 232 or 301 will be slower, requiring feasibility studies (up to 270 days for 232) and inviting more APA lawsuits, unlike the instantaneous executive orders under AIPA.
- The speaker views the invalidation of AIPA tariffs as 'too unpopular' for a 'liberation day 2.0' in an election year and considers it 'one of the most bullish catalysts of the entire year' because it is immediately deflationary and improves corporate margins.

**Context:** The discussion centers on the imminent ruling by the US Supreme Court regarding Donald Trump's tariffs issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (AIPA). These AIPA tariffs allow the President to issue reciprocal tariffs via executive order, unlike other mechanisms like Section 232 or 301, which are harder to apply broadly. The ruling is viewed as critical because it could determine the path of the US economy, potentially influencing whether the nation achieves a soft landing or enters a recession, especially given recent mixed economic data concerning labor markets and manufacturing surveys.

## Detailed Analysis

The Supreme Court is reviewing lawsuits, including Learning Resources v. Trump and VOS Selections v. Trump, challenging the legality of Trump's AIPA tariffs, with lower courts having previously ruled against the President before the Federal Circuit stayed the decision. The speaker strongly anticipates the Supreme Court will strike down these tariffs, pointing to skepticism from six justices during arguments and the application of the Major Questions Doctrine, which demands clear Congressional authorization for actions of vast economic significance, which the AIPA tariffs lack compared to more constrained mechanisms like Section 232. The market reflects this expectation, evidenced by over a thousand companies filing lawsuits to recoup an estimated $160 billion, betting on the tariffs' invalidation. If AIPA tariffs fail, Trump must resort to slower methods like 232 tariffs, which require lengthy studies and invite more lawsuits, delaying any significant tariff impact until after the midterms, which the speaker sees as a bullish outcome for inflation and corporate margins, giving the Federal Reserve room for six potential rate cuts. However, the court might only narrowly define the AIPA scope and kick the can down the road on other tariff challenges, as Justice Kavanaugh suggested dealing with other sections when lawsuits arise.

### Supreme Court Tariff Review

- Arguments suggested Trump would lose on reciprocal and fentanyl tariffs
- Court of International Trade ruled against AIPA tariffs on May 28th
- Federal Circuit upheld the ruling but stayed it on August 29th.

### Legal Basis for Striking Down Tariffs

- Primary issue is the Major Questions Doctrine, requiring Congress to clearly grant power for vast economic actions
- AIPA reciprocal tariffs are not clearly designated by Congress, unlike 232 tariffs.

### Market Reaction and Financial Stakes

- Over a thousand companies are suing Trump to collect expected refunds totaling around $160 billion
- Traders are rushing into stocks like Restoration Hardware, benefiting from expected tariff repeal.

### Economic Context and Fed Outlook

- Labor market shows weakness (lower JOLTS openings) but low job cuts (Challenger reports lowest since July 2024)
- Survey data signals cracking resilience and weak expansion, conflicting with backward-looking jobs reports.

### Alternative Tariff Implementation

- Section 232 tariffs require a Commerce Department study taking up to 270 days and invite more APA lawsuits
- Section 338 tariffs have not been used in nearly 100 years.

### Bullish Conclusion for Markets

- Invalidating AIPA tariffs is immediately deflationary and removes margin baggage, creating a 'bullish catalyst' for the year
- This removes pressure, potentially giving the Fed license to cut rates significantly.