# Deep State PSYOPS Targeting Troops — EXPOSED! Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_wwi592dn8 Recap page: https://rapidrecap.app/video/U_wwi592dn8 Generated: 2025-11-28T21:33:34.81+00:00 --- ## Quick Overview The speaker asserts that current political narratives surrounding military personnel refusing orders, exemplified by tweets from Carl Higbie and Paul Rieckhoff, represent an organized, CIA/Army Field Manual-style psychological operation designed to create division, specifically by undermining trust in the military's institutional integrity and potentially weakening support for President Trump. He contrasts this with a historical anecdote about a military officer named Now who faced consequences for refusing a UN order, suggesting that the current rhetoric is dangerously misleading military members about their obligations regarding lawful versus unlawful orders. **Key Points:** - The speaker believes current political discourse, highlighted by tweets from Carl Higbie and Paul Rieckhoff, constitutes a massive, organized psychological operation (psy-op) derived from military manuals. - Higbie's tweet suggested that negative opinions of Trump in recent weeks likely mean the viewer is a victim of a Democrat-run psy-op. - The speaker cites a military officer named Now, who was court-martialed in 1996 for refusing an order to wear UN garb while on a peacekeeping mission in Macedonia, illustrating the prior consequences for insubordination. - Rieckhoff's tweet implied that telling military members they do not have to obey an 'illegal order' without scrutiny creates a risk of insubordination and undermines the chain of command. - The speaker argues that this rhetoric injects fear, urgency, and defiance where none is warranted, potentially fracturing trust in the institution. - The speaker contrasts the current situation with the historical example of Caesar crossing the Rubicon, which he argues was necessitated by corruption and political persecution, not arbitrary misconduct. ![Screenshot at 00:00: A man speaking directly to the camera while displaying a tweet from Carl Higbie claiming Democrats are running a psy-op against Trump supporters, setting the stage for the video's argument about organized political disinformation.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/U_wwi592dn8/00-00-00.png) **Context:** The video features a commentator discussing recent social media posts, particularly from Carl Higbie and Paul Rieckhoff, which address military personnel's duty to obey orders, especially concerning alleged 'illegal orders.' The discussion centers on whether current political rhetoric is intentionally sowing division within the military by misrepresenting legal obligations, drawing parallels to historical events like Caesar crossing the Rubicon and a specific 1990s court-martial case involving an officer named Now who refused a UN deployment order. ## Detailed Analysis The speaker analyzes recent political commentary on social media, arguing that narratives encouraging military personnel to question orders constitute a deliberate psychological operation, possibly sourced from US Army psy-ops manuals. He cites a tweet from Carl Higbie (00:00) suggesting that negative opinions of Trump are manufactured through a Democrat-run psy-op. He then references a tweet from InfantryDort (2:17) detailing concerns about the administration putting uniformed personnel against American citizens, planting seeds of doubt, and destabilizing the institution. The speaker emphasizes the danger in suggesting service members can unilaterally decide which orders are legal, contrasting this with the case of an officer named Now, who in 1998 refused an order to wear UN garb during a peacekeeping mission in Macedonia and was subsequently court-martialed for disobeying (8:06). The speaker highlights that Now's superiors told him he would face conviction for disobeying, and Now stated he had taken an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not the UN (8:27). The commentator then critiques a tweet by Paul Rieckhoff (10:46) comparing Trump's legal challenges to Caesar crossing the Rubicon, calling the comparison 'stupid' and historically inaccurate because Caesar was acting to defend himself against corruption (12:48). The speaker concludes that the rhetoric being used—telling service members to refuse orders without proper legal scrutiny—is dangerous, as it injects fear, urgency, and defiance, leading to unnecessary disorientation among troops. ### Analysis of Carl Higbie's Tweet - Dems are running US Army psy-ops STRAIGHT out of the manual - If your opinion has gone negative on Trump, you are likely the victim of a massive [democrat-run] Psy-op - This is organized, regime change, color revolution propaganda straight out of the CIA psychological operations handbook (00:00-00:17) ### Analysis of InfantryDort's Tweets - Americans trust their military. But that trust is at risk. - This administration is putting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens - This is even more dramatic. It places service members on psychological alert for a confrontation that does not exist. And suggesting it does is profoundly destabilizing (2:17-04:03) ### Analysis of Thomas Hern's Tweet - Sick of the gaslighting from Democrats and media - Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, and Chrissy Houlahan were not calling for military members to disobey 'illegal' orders, they were calling for them to disobey Trump's orders - This is like when 51 former intelligence officers published a letter saying the Hunter Biden laptop had the 'ear markings of Russian disinformation' and then later when evidence pointed to its authenticity, they denied claiming it was Russian disinformation (6:25-07:11) ### Historical Case Study (Officer Now) - Now was ordered to participate in a UN peacekeeping mission in Macedonia in 1998 - After learning he would have to wear UN garb, he requested a transfer to a non-UN unit or an honorable discharge - He was convicted of disobeying an order because he refused to do his duty according to his attorneys (8:00-09:19) ### Analysis of Paul Rieckhoff's Tweet - Trump and Hegseth crossed the Rubicon today - Their attack on veteran @SenMarkKelly thrusts America into a new and dangerous place - Crossing the Rubicon refers to Caesar returning to Rome, which triggered a civil war (10:46-12:16) ### The Danger of Misleading Military Personnel - The speaker argues that telling soldiers they don't have to obey an order unless they personally deem it legal encourages insubordination - If you race your vehicle at an ICE officer, you've committed assault, which is a federal felony (14:41-15:12) ![Screenshot at 00:00: Carl Higbie's tweet claiming Democrats are running a psy-op straight out of the Army field manual to influence opinions against Trump.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/U_wwi592dn8/00-00-00.png) ![Screenshot at 02:44: InfantryDort's tweet detailing concerns that the administration is putting military professionals against American citizens, creating a psychological alert for a non-existent confrontation.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/U_wwi592dn8/00-02-44.png) ![Screenshot at 06:25: Phil Ehr's tweet outlining the protocol for service members when feeling uncomfortable with an order, distinguishing between enlisted personnel, officers, and retired officers.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/U_wwi592dn8/00-06-25.png) ![Screenshot at 07:46: Norva Damnbusiness's tweet asserting that the bullshit argument about disobeying illegal orders has been tried and failed, referencing a military member's refusal to wear UN garb in Macedonia.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/U_wwi592dn8/00-07-46.png) ![Screenshot at 10:40: Phil Ehr's follow-up tweet illustrating the perceived idiocy of the left's position with a hypothetical exchange about an unlawful order.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/U_wwi592dn8/00-10-40.png)