EU Slammed By China For Lack Of Basic History

Quick Overview

China's foreign ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, criticized EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell's remarks about China's role in challenging the global rules-based order, stating that Borrell's comments were biased and ignored historical facts, particularly China's significant contributions to the Allied victory in World War II and its role in maintaining global stability.

Key Points: China's foreign ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, criticized EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell for his remarks about China challenging the rules-based international order. Lin Jian accused Borrell of exhibiting ideological bias and ignoring historical facts, specifically China's role in World War II. Borrell stated that autocratic alliances are seeking a fast track to a new world order, citing the meeting of leaders from Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China as evidence of a direct challenge to the international system built on rules. Lin Jian highlighted that China played a central role in the Allied victory in World War II, suffering immense casualties and contributing significantly to the defeat of Axis powers. China's resistance to Japanese aggression tied down millions of Japanese troops, preventing them from being deployed elsewhere. Lin Jian argued that Borrell's remarks were irresponsible and detrimental to EU-China relations, urging him to adhere to basic historical facts and a neutral stance. The spokesperson emphasized that China's actions are aimed at promoting peace and stability, not challenging the existing international order.

Context: The video discusses a statement made by the EU's foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, regarding China's perceived challenge to the global rules-based order. Borrell linked China's actions to those of Russia, Iran, and North Korea, suggesting an autocratic alliance seeking to reshape the world. China's foreign ministry, represented by spokesperson Lin Jian, responded by criticizing Borrell's remarks, accusing him of bias and historical revisionism, and emphasizing China's contributions to the Allied victory in World War II.