# The Best Model For AI Coding Is... Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClgrxpyhRfM Recap page: https://rapidrecap.app/video/ClgrxpyhRfM Generated: 2026-02-22T19:33:01.101+00:00 --- ## Quick Overview The best model for general coding tasks is Opus 4.6, while GPT-5.3 Codex High excels as a planner and bug killer, and Gemini Pro 3.1 is best reserved for creative frontend code, according to the creator's tier list. **Key Points:** - Opus 4.6 is designated as the primary "Coder" model for general programming tasks. - GPT-5.3 Codex High is recommended specifically for "Planner & Bug Killer" roles in coding. - Gemini Pro 3.1 is best suited for generating "Creative frontend code" but struggles with complex logic and looping. - The creator advises against using Gemini Pro 3.1 for general code output due to its tendency to go 'barbaric' or loop endlessly. - GPT-5.3 Codex High, while excellent for planning, is noted to be significantly slower than other models. - The creator introduced a new feature called 'Composites' allowing users to upload a reference thumbnail for reusable element swapping. ![Screenshot at 00:00: The creator, wearing an orange suit with a white star mask, sits precariously on a cable of the Golden Gate Bridge at sunrise, setting an unconventional and attention-grabbing visual tone for the presentation.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ClgrxpyhRfM/00-00-00.jpg) **Context:** The video features a creator, likely Corbin Braun, discussing and demonstrating the comparative performance of various large language models (LLMs) for coding tasks, referencing a recent social media tier list he published. He specifically evaluates Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6, OpenAI's GPT-5.3 Codex High, and Google's Gemini Pro 3.1 based on their strengths in planning, execution, and user interface design. ## Detailed Analysis The creator outlines his current preferred coding model tier list: Gemini Pro 3.1 for creative frontend code, GPT-5.3 Codex-5.3 for planning and bug killing, and Opus 4.6 as the main coder. He explains that while no single model is a one-size-fits-all solution, the best practice is to use different models for different tasks. He demonstrates switching between models in the interface (Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.3 Codex High) to illustrate their distinct capabilities. Opus 4.6 is praised for its reliable logic and ability to generate good code outputs based on a plan, although it can be slow. Gemini 3.1 Pro produces visually appealing UI code but is prone to issues like infinite loops or going 'barbaric' when handling complex logic. GPT-5.3 Codex High is noted for its superior planning abilities but suffers from being extremely slow, often requiring multiple meetings/days for complex tasks. The creator also showcases a new feature in their software called 'Composites,' which allows users to upload a reference thumbnail and then easily swap out people, text, and other elements to generate new variations, demonstrating this by using a thumbnail from Morgan Housel's book 'The Psychology of Money' as a reference. ### LLM Coding Tier List - Opus 4.6 is the best general coder - GPT-5.3 Codex High is the best planner/bug killer - Gemini Pro 3.1 is for creative frontend UI code only ### Model Performance Analysis - Opus 4.6 offers reliable logic and code output - Gemini 3.1 Pro makes beautiful UI but fails on complex logic/loops - GPT-5.3 Codex High is slow (taking days for complex plans) but strong at planning ### Software Feature Showcase - New 'Composites' feature allows uploading a reference thumbnail for reusable element swapping (people, text, etc.) - Demonstrates creating a thumbnail set based on 'The Art of Spending Money' template ### Workflow Recommendation - Use Gemini for planning/UI, Opus for core coding logic, and GPT-Codex for high-level planning and bug fixing, avoiding running complex logic on Gemini. ![Screenshot at 00:17: The creator displays the model selection dropdown menu in the application interface, showing available models including Opus 4.6, GPT-5.3 Codex High, and Gemini 3.1 Pro.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ClgrxpyhRfM/00-00-17.jpg) ![Screenshot at 00:32: A screenshot of the creator's posted tier list differentiating model strengths: Gemini for frontend, Codex for planning/bug killing, and Opus for coding.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ClgrxpyhRfM/00-00-32.jpg) ![Screenshot at 01:18: The creator shows examples of code output from different models, emphasizing the need for a 'G3' \(Git commit\) safeguard when using Gemini due to instability.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ClgrxpyhRfM/00-01-18.jpg) ![Screenshot at 02:58: The interface switches to the 'Create New Composition' screen, showcasing existing template compositions saved by the user.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ClgrxpyhRfM/00-02-58.jpg) ![Screenshot at 03:44: The user interface for creating a new composition is shown, allowing selection of 'People' and editing specific 'Text' fields from a reference thumbnail.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/ClgrxpyhRfM/00-03-44.jpg)