# Good Boy - DOGGIE HORROR FILM? - Angry Movie Review Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhLdzuAUGg8 Recap page: https://rapidrecap.app/video/BhLdzuAUGg8 Generated: 2025-10-04T19:03:42.237+00:00 --- ## Quick Overview The reviewers strongly disliked the horror movie "Good Boy," rating it a 5/10 overall, primarily because they felt the film prioritized the dog's storyline over the horror elements, leading to an anticlimactic, non-scary, and ultimately frustrating ending where the dog's owner was revealed to be the monster. **Key Points:** - The reviewers collectively rated the horror film "Good Boy" a 5/10. - The main critique was that the film felt more like a dog movie than a horror film, focusing too much on the dog's journey. - The reviewers were frustrated that the plot heavily emphasized the dog, Indy, and his owner, Todd, over delivering effective horror. - One specific point of frustration was the ending, where the owner is revealed to be the monster, which the host felt was poorly executed compared to the dog's heroism. - The film took over three years to film using bits and pieces, which the host felt did not translate into a satisfying final product. - The movie features the dog constantly seeing things humans cannot, such as the entity in the woods, which the reviewers found unconvincing. - The director, Ben Lowenberg, is also the writer, and the reviewers felt the story failed to pay off its initial setup. ![Screenshot at 01:18: The lead reviewer expresses frustration by holding his hands to his head while discussing the perceived poor execution of the film's plot points and ending.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-01-18.png) **Context:** The video is an Angry Movie Review segment where three hosts dissect the horror/mystery/thriller film "Good Boy," which focuses on a canine hero named Indy protecting his owner, Todd. The hosts discuss the film's premise, execution, critical reception (including high Rotten Tomatoes scores), and ultimately deliver their final verdict and score. ## Detailed Analysis The three reviewers express significant disappointment with the film "Good Boy," ultimately giving it a 5/10 rating. The main host argues that the film's concept—a supernatural entity attacking the dog's owner, Todd—was excellent, but the execution failed because the film spent too much time focusing on the dog's perspective and emotional journey rather than delivering solid horror. They mention the film took over three years to make, shooting bits and pieces, which resulted in a bloated narrative. The reviewers were particularly upset by the ending where the owner is revealed to be the monster, which they felt was illogical and unsatisfying given the narrative buildup about the dog protecting the owner from the entity. They noted that the film seemed to be trying to play both sides—a heartwarming dog movie and a supernatural horror—but failed to make either aspect truly work, especially since the dog's supernatural sight didn't seem to matter when the owner was revealed as the true threat. The host states he was already upset with the ending before the reveal. ### Initial Impressions and Reception - The film received high scores (93% on Rotten Tomatoes, 89% Popcorn Meter), but the reviewers were personally disappointed with the final product - The host Joe was initially excited after seeing the trailer, noting the premise was about the dog Indy protecting his owner Todd from an entity. ### Critique of Horror Execution - The film felt more like a feel-good dog story than a horror film, lacking effective scares, especially in the second act - The reviewers point out that the dog is shown seeing supernatural things, but the owner's eventual turn into the monster felt unearned and illogical. ### Specific Plot Issues - The owner, Todd, is revealed to be the monster who was attacking the dog, which the hosts felt was a poor payoff to the setup - They cite moments like the dog being left outside in the cold or the owner being covered in blood as confusing narrative choices. ### Final Verdict and Score - The final verdict is a 5/10, with the hosts concluding that the film's attempt to balance both dog movie tropes and horror tropes resulted in a failure to satisfy either expectation - The host Joe explicitly states he wanted the dog to win and wished the movie had focused more on the dog's heroism. ![Screenshot at 00:03: The opening title card for the "Angry Movie Review" segment featuring film industry props.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-00-03.png) ![Screenshot at 00:11: The three reviewers \(left to right: one looking slightly bored, one contemplative, one animatedly talking\) sitting in their gaming chairs reacting to the movie trailer.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-00-11.png) ![Screenshot at 00:18: A brief clip from the movie showing the dog walking across a floor, leaving a wet shadow.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-00-18.png) ![Screenshot at 00:20: A close-up shot from the movie trailer with the text overlay "MAN'S BEST FRIEND."](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-00-20.png) ![Screenshot at 00:26: A wide shot from the movie trailer showing the dog being carried on a man's shoulders outdoors during cherry blossom season.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-00-26.png) ![Screenshot at 01:16: A movie quote overlay reading "IF SOMETHING HAPPENS TO HIM..." over a dark shot of a dog looking up.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-01-16.png) ![Screenshot at 01:42: A movie quote overlay reading "LOOKS FANTASTIC... IF THE DOG LIVES."](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-01-42.png) ![Screenshot at 02:20: A shot of an old CRT television screen displaying the text "GOOD BOY."](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-02-20.png) ![Screenshot at 03:06: A screenshot from the movie showing Rotten Tomatoes scores \(93% Tomatometer, 89% Popcornmeter\) for "Good Boy."](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-03-06.png) ![Screenshot at 04:40: The reviewer on the right gesturing wildly while explaining his frustration with the film's plotting, while the other two listen/react.](https://ss.rapidrecap.app/screens/BhLdzuAUGg8/00-04-40.png)