Piers Morgan Calls For The Army To Deal With Immigration
Quick Overview
Piers Morgan criticizes the UK's immigration policy, contrasting it with a more decisive approach he attributes to Donald Trump, while Aaron Bastani explains the origins of the EU's free movement policy and its impact on UK immigration.
Key Points: Piers Morgan suggests the UK should be more like Trump's immigration policies, including using the military to stop migrants and potentially sinking boats, which he believes would be effective. Morgan questions why the UK is afraid to use the military for border control, stating that Trump's approach has worked in the US. Aaron Bastani explains that the "big shift" in migration is downstream from the Single European Act of 1986/1987, which created the EU's single market and free movement of people. Bastani notes that non-EU migration was the decisive factor in the 90s and early 00s, while EU migration didn't surge until accession states joined in 2005. Bastani highlights that the EU's expansion and creation of a single market led to increased migration from Central and Eastern European countries. Bastani argues that the UK's large net migration figures are a direct consequence of these EU policies, which he suggests were underestimated by the civil service. The discussion touches on the political implications of these migration trends, with Bastani pointing out that opposition to EU membership, a key driver of Brexit, was fueled by these factors.
Context: This video features a discussion between Piers Morgan and Aaron Bastani regarding immigration policies, particularly in the context of the UK and the European Union. Morgan expresses a strong opinion on the need for stricter border controls, drawing parallels to Donald Trump's policies. Bastani provides a historical and economic perspective on the EU's role in shaping migration patterns into the UK, linking it to key legislative acts and political shifts.
Detailed Analysis
Piers Morgan and Aaron Bastani debate immigration policies, with Morgan advocating for a hardline approach similar to Donald Trump's, including military intervention and potentially sinking migrant boats. Morgan questions the UK's hesitancy to adopt such measures, citing Trump's perceived success in the US. Bastani counters by providing a historical analysis, explaining that the significant increase in migration to the UK is largely a consequence of the EU's Single European Act of 1986/1987 and the subsequent creation of the single market. He details how EU expansion in 2005 led to a surge in migration from accession states and argues that the civil service underestimated the impact of these policies. Bastani connects these developments to the rise of Euroscepticism and the eventual Brexit vote, suggesting that the perceived uncontrolled migration was a major catalyst. The discussion also touches upon the idea that the EU itself functions as an empire, influencing national policies and creating long-term demographic shifts.